Objectives for The Texas Education Agency Lone Star Governance Continous Improvement Framework

Self evaluation by: 10/31/2018
Goal: +15 points or 60% increase
Duration: 7/1/2018 - 9/31/2018

3
Quarter
42
Score
+/-
Change
Last updated 3 mins ago
Section Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Extra Meetings Needed Total Possible Points
Vision 1 2 12 15 3 12
Vision 2 14 12 2 4 12
Vision 3 9 14 12 3 12
Accountability 1 0 0 3 4 4
Accountability 2 0 0 0 4 4
Advocacy 9 12 8 2 12
Structure 12 3 4 6 4
Unity 5 14 10 7 12
Totals 51 67 54 33 100

Progress Measures of Goals

Last updated 3 mins ago
Preparing to Focus
8
VPM 1.2 Completed
VPM 1.3 Completed
VPM 1.8 Not Started
VPM 1.9 Not Started
VPM 1.10 Not Started
Approaches Focus
3
VPM 1.4 Completed
VPM 1.5 In Progress
VPM 1.11 Next Quarter
Meets Focus
1
VPM 1.1 Completed
VPM 1.6 In Progress
Masters Focus
3
VPM 1.7 Next Quarter
VPM 1.12 Completed

The Board will meet focus when all of the following conditions are true:

VPM 1.1
The Board relied on a root cause analysis, comprehensive student needs assessment, and/ or similar research-based tool to inform identification of and prioritization of potential student outcome goals.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.2
Pre-Design Workshop Meeting with DEIC. Pre-Design Workshop Meeting held with the DEIC, Board President, Superintendent to establish communication and inputs for the upcoming Workshop. This addresses the "The Board owned the vision development process while working collaboratively with the Superintendent" of the Vision 1 Framework.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.3
The Board owned the goals development process while working collaboratively with the Superintendent.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.4
Each goal describes a baseline (current state), a target (future state), a population (which students will be impacted), and a deadline (date by when the current state will equal the future state). (e.g. "[population]'s ability to demonstrate [measure] is currently at [baseline] and will be at [target] by [deadline]" or "The number of high performing campuses will increase from [baseline] to [target] by [deadline]").
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.5
The goals are all student outcome goals (they all describe what students know or are able to do) as distinct from adult inputs, adult outputs, student inputs, and student outputs. All Board Members and the Superintendent agree that the student outcome goals are all SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, results-focused, time- bound), will challenge the organization, and will require adult behavior change.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.6
The deadline for each goal to reach the target is no fewer than 3 years away. No more than 5 years are recommended.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.7
Students, families, teachers, and community members were involved in the vision and student outcome goals development process in such a manner that there is broad community acceptance of the Board's vision and student outcome goals.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.8
The Board has a Board-adopted vision statement.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.9
The Board has adopted goals.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.10
The Board has adopted no fewer than 1 and no more than 5 goals. Three is the recommended number.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.11
The Board has adopted an annual target for each goal in addition to its deadline target. These are not GPMs.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)
VPM 1.12
All Board Members have committed the vision and student outcome goals to memory and know, at all times, the current status of each student outcome goal.
Add Evidence (2) | Add Related Items (1)

Vision 2 (3/12 Tasks Completed)

Vision 3 (0/12 Tasks Completed)

Vision 4 (0/12 Tasks Completed)

Accountability 1 (0/12 Tasks Completed)

Accountability 2 (0/12 Tasks Completed)